- Visibility 599 Views
- Downloads 779 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.agems.v.12.i.1.5
-
CrossMark
Technological innovations in geriatric rehabilitation: Virtual reality and telehealth applications
- Author Details:
-
Sri Valli Chekuri
-
Mohammed. Sheeba Kauser *
Mohammed. Sheeba Kauser *
The aging global population presents increasing demand for effective, accessible, and personalized rehabilitation services. Technological innovations—particularly virtual reality (VR) and telehealth—are reshaping geriatric rehabilitation by enabling remote therapy, improving engagement, and enhancing clinical outcomes. This review examines the integration of VR and telehealth into rehabilitation programs for older adults, focusing on their roles in mobility training, balance improvement, cognitive enhancement, and chronic disease management. Evidence suggests that immersive VR environments can motivate elderly patients and provide real-time feedback, while telehealth platforms facilitate remote monitoring, continuity of care, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Despite promising results, challenges persist in digital accessibility, user adaptability, and system interoperability. The review also highlights recent advancements and outlines future directions aimed at maximizing the effectiveness and inclusivity of these technologies in geriatric care.
References
- Bowling A. Quality of life in older age: What older people say. In: Mollenkopf H and Walker A (eds) Quality of life in old age. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007, pp.15–30.
- Hasan H, Linger H. Enhancing the wellbeing of the elderly: Social use of digital technologies in aged care. Educ Gerontol 2016; 42(11):749–57.
- Vanleerberghe P, De Witte N, Cet C al. et al. The quality of life of older people aging in place: A literature review. Qual Life Res 2017;26:2899–2907. Riva G, Gaggioli A, Villani D, et al. Positive technology for healthy living and active ageing. In: Active ageing and healthy living: A human centered approach in research and innovation as source of quality of life. IOS Press, 2014, pp.44–56.
- Şahin DS, Özer Ö, Yanardağ MZ. Perceived social support, quality of life and satisfaction with life in elderly people. Educ Gerontol 2019; 45: 69–77.
- Akbar MF, Ramadhani N, Putri RA. Assistive and wearable technology for elderly. Bullet Soc Informat Theory Appl. 2018;2(1):8–14.
- Orimo H, Ito H, Tet S. Reviewing the definition of “elderly.” Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2006; 6:149–58.
- Amarya S, Singh K, Sabharwal M. Ageing process and physiological changes. In: Grazia DO, Antonio G and Daniele S (eds) Gerontology. Rijeka: IntechOpen, 2018, pp. 3–24.
- Siegel C, Dorner TE. Information technologies for active and assisted living—influences to the quality of life of an ageing society. Int J Med Inf 2017; 100:32–45.
- Rodríguez-Fórtiz MJ, Rodríguez-Domínguez C, Cano P, et al. Serious games for the cognitive stimulation of elderly people. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on serious games and applications for health (SeGAH) 2016, IEEE, New York, pp 1–7.
- Irazoki E, Contreras-Somoza LM, Toribio-Guzmán JM. Technologies for cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation for people with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. a systematic review. Front Psychol 2020;11:648.
- Zheng L, Li G, Wang X. Effect of exergames on physical outcomes in frail elderly: A systematic review. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020; 32:2187–2200.
- Grossi G, Lanzarotti R, Pet N. Positive technology for elderly well- being: A review. Pattern Recognit Lett 2020;137:61–70.
- Kuo HL, Chang CH, Ma WF. A survey of mobile apps for the care management of patients wit h dementia. Healthcare (Basel ).2022;10(7):1173.
- Overmann KM, Wu DTY, Xu CT. Real-time locating systems to improve healthcare delivery: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28:1308–17.
- Moyle W, Murfield J, Lion K. The effectiveness of smart home technologies to support the health outcomes of community-dwelling older adults living with dementia: A scoping review. Int J Med Inf. 2021;153:104513.
- Méndez JI, Mata O, Ponce Pet al. et al. Multi-sensor system, gamification, and artificial intelligence for benefit elderly people. In: Ponce H, Martínez-Villaseñor L, Brieva J. (eds) Challenges and trends in multimodal fall detection for healthcare. 1st ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020.pp.207–35.
- Czaja SJ. The potential role of technology in supporting older adults. Public Policy Aging Rep. 2017;27(2):44–8.
- Lee N, Kim J, Hwang J. Potential of augmented reality and virtual reality technologies to promote wellbeing in older adults. Appl Sci 2019; 9(17):3556.
- Corregidor-Sánchez A-I, Segura-Fragoso A, Criado-Álvarez J. Effectiveness of virtual reality systems to improve the activities of daily life in older people. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17.
- Shen X, Shirmohammadi S. Virtual and augmented reality. In: Furht B. (ed) Encyclopedia of multimedia. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2008, pp.962–7.
- Vyas DA, Bhatt D. Augmented reality (ar) applications: A survey on current trends, challenges, & future scope. Int J Adv Res Comp Sci. 2017;8:2724–30
- De Bruin E, Schoene D, Pichierri Get al. et al. Use of virtual reality technique for the training of motor control in the elderly. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2010; 43: 229–34.
- Carroll J, Hopper L, Farrelly AM. A scoping review of augmented/virtual reality health and wellbeing interventions for older adults: Redefining immersive virtual reality. Front Virt Reality 2021; 2.
- Hoeg ER, Povlsen TM, Bruun-Pedersen JR. System immersion in virtual reality-based rehabilitation of motor function in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Virt Reality 2021;2:
- Strandberg TE. Chapter 2 - Quality of life in older people. In: Martin CR, Preedy VR and Rajendram R (eds) Assessments, treatments and 25 Chekuri and Kauser / Annals of Geriatric Education and Medical Sciences 2025;12(1):18-25 modeling in aging and neurological disease. 1st ed. Academic Press, 202; pp.13–9.