Get Permission Vani R, Cariena Joseph, Abiya, Aleena, Akhila, Algeena, Tinu, Namitha, Suma, Treesa, Usha, Saji, Adithya, and Abhilash: A true experimental study to assess the effectiveness of Aloe-vera juice in relieving constipation among older adults in a selected hospital, Kolar


Introduction

Aloe vera is widely used as a strong laxative and to promote gastrointestinal motility. Aloe vera treatment may be beneficial for patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome or functional constipation.1 It may be used as a natural remedy for constipation and eaten in a juice, gel, or tablet form. When constipated, aloe Aloe latex is mostly administered orally to help the intestines spontaneously empty.2 As a result, osmotic laxatives and lifestyle modification stimulants are the primary therapy in the management algorithm.3

Persistent constipation appears to be somewhat frequent among people in general.4 According to estimates, between 2% and 28% of Indians experience chronic constipation; the majority of estimates range between 12% and 19%. Depending on the diagnostic criteria, its occurrence varies.5 Chronic constipation disproportionately affects women (2:2:1), and as people age, the incidence has increased.6

One study found that elderly people who consume less calories and meals are also more likely to become constipated.7 Comorbid diseases and residing in a care facility are two possible risk factors for constipation.8

Constipation is a common issue and challenge for the elderly. Constipation increases with age and is environment-related.9 The incidence is 26% for women and 26% for males among community members 65 years of age or older; the greatest rate is found among individuals 84 years of age or older. It may affect as many as 80% of residents in long-term care settings.10

Hence, the investigator has decided to manage constipation by using home remedial measures with affordable prices among old age people with use of aloe Aloe vera. Because it is one of easily available medicinal aloe Aloe vera and had got many medicinal effects.

Materials & Methods

After obtaining the institutional ethics committee approval (CTRI/2023/11/059828), a single-blinded randomized control trial study was conducted among the elderly in a tertiary care Hospital from September to November 2023. Volunteer inclusion criteria were adults aged≥ 60 years, seeking medical services at IPD, able to speak and understand Kannada or English, and accessible for follow-up throughout the study period by providing written consent. Participant recruitment of older adult’s aged ≥60 years who are seeking medical services at R.LJ. Hospital and Research Centre, Tamaka, Kolar. (n=30) in the Experimental group and Control group (n=30), were recruited by using a Block randomization technique. The experimental group was given aloevera Aloe vera juice whereas the Control group received Routine care. Geriatric clients with co-morbid conditions of cardiovascular disorders and Diabetes were excluded. Participant information sheets and written consent forms were given to older adults which were translated in the regional language upon returning the consent forms, participants were invited to attend the study for one month. A sample size of 60 participants was chosen in line with previous sample size recommendations of feasibility studies.

Setting of the study

Tertiary Care hospital, at R.L. Jalappa Hospital and Research Centre, Tamaka, Kolar.

Sample size

derived by employing the Med. Calc statistical software assessed the difference between the two means as 14.2 and the SD or variance of 22.7 with the effect size of 0.2, with a 80% power of the study and a predetermined significance level of 95% (CI) with a two-tailed test and 5% absolute precision alpha error (d) and assuming 10% to be an attrition rate the estimated sample size was around 25 in each group. If 10% of the sample's dropouts were taken into account, the estimated sample size was around 30 in each group

Considering the Cochran’s formula

n =2(Zα +Z 1-β)2 σ2d2
  1. Zα= 95% Confidence Interval β) = Power of the study as 80%

  2. σ2 Average variance estimation d = Effect size.

Sampling technique

Block randomization where wards have been categorized using Rraosoftware into blocks of 4x4 and the blocks were classified based on Block A as experimental group & Block B as control group.

Data collection tools

The tool was prepared based on the research problem, objectives of the study stated were assessed by using standardized Constipation Assessment Scale (CAS).11

Section-I: Proforma on Sociodemographic variables: age, gender, marital status, Educational qualification, Type of family, Co-morbidities, Health checkups undergone, and Bio physiological parameters were assessed such as Nutritional status, Vision, hearing acuity, Sleep pattern, Bowel & Bladder pattern, Physical activity per day, were recorded to provide participants’ baseline characteristics. It is shown in the Table 2.

Section II: McMillan and Williams (1989) Standardized Eight item “Constipation Assessment Scale” used on old age people who have constipation. represented in the Table 3, Table 4, Table 5.

Intervention

Add 5ml-10ml of aloe Aloevera gel of 100 milligrams per day and Mix with 100 ml of water. Each day, 2 inch portions of aloe Aloe vera gel along with 1 cup of water to a blender were added. Blend only for 30 to 60 seconds until the aloe Aloe vera gel is fully crushed. Each day fresh juice is prepared and served to experimental group till 20 days and posttest assessed on 10th and 20th day.12, 13, 14, 15 RMANOVA Performed to assess the effectiveness of aloevera juice represented in Figure 1.

Table 0

Data analysis

Methods

Type of Statistics

Purposes

Descriptive Statistics

Frequency, Percentage, Mean, SD

Participants socio-demographic characteristics

Inferential Statistics

Paired ‘t’ test

Compare the outcome variables before and after intervention within the group

Independent ‘t’ test

Compare the outcome variables before and after Intervention between the groups

Repeated Measures of ANOVA

Assess differences in outcome over time.

Chi-square

Find an association of selected socio-demographic variables with outcome variables

Table 1

Distribution of the geriatric clients of the Experimental and Control groups based on their socio-demographic characteristics

Sl.no

Demographic Variables

Category

Study groups f (%)

df

χ² & (p value)

Experimental

Control

1.

Age (in Years)

60-70

27 (90)

20 (66.6)

2

Fisher exact test 0.0575. NS p > .05.

71-80

3 (10)

10 (33.3)

2.

Gender

Male

17 (56.6)

18 (60)

1

χ²= 0.068 (.793) NS p > .05.

Female

13 (43.3)

12 (40)

3.

Educational status

Formal education

16(53.3)

17 (56.6)

1

χ²= 0.078 (.551) NS p > .05

No formal education

14 (46.6)

13 (43.3)

4.

Religion

Hindu

24 (80)

23(76.6)

1

χ²=0.098 (.754) NS p > .05.

Muslim

6 (20)

7 (23.3)

5.

Marital Status

Married

22 (73.3)

24 (80)

1

χ²=0.372(.541) NS p > .05.

Widowed/widower

8(26.6)

6(20)

6.

Place of Residence

Rural

23 (76.6)

22 (73.3)

χ²= 0.088(.765) NS p > .05.

Semi-urban/ Urban

7 (23.3)

8 (26.6)

1

7.

Socio-economic Status

APL

6(20)

5(16.6)

1

χ²= 0.111 (.738) NS p > .05

BPL

24(80)

25 (83.3)

8.

Type of Family

Nuclear Family

26 (86.6)

23 (76.6)

1

χ²=1.00(.316) NS p > .05.

Joint Family

4 (13.3)

7 (23.3)

9.

Nutritional Status

Under-weight

19 (63.3)

18 (60)

2

χ²=0.451 (.798) NS p > .05.

Normal weight

6 (20)

5 (16.6)

Overweight / Obese

5 (16.6)

7 (23.3)

10

Sleeping Pattern

Normal /Adequate

21 (70)

22 (73.3)

1

χ²=0.082 (.774) NS p > .05

Disturbed/Inadequate

9 (30)

8 (26.6)

11

Bowel

Regular

5 (16.6)

9 (30)

1

χ²=1.490(.222) NS p > .05

Irregular

25 (83.3)

21 (70)

12

Bladder

Normal

25 (83.3)

24 (80)

1

χ²= 0.111(.738) NS p > .05.

Urinary Incontinence

5(16.6)

6 (20)

13

Physical Activity Performed Per day

Not Involved

17 (56.6)

12 (40)

1

χ²=1.668(.196) NS p > .05

Low

13 (43.3)

18 (60)

[i] Data presentation The data of both study groups are expressed as frequency (f) and percentage in parenthesis.

[ii] Study groups: Experimental group-geriatrics who underwent Multimodal Intervention regarding Health promotion, Control group- geriatrics who did not undergo Multimodal Intervention.

[iii] Homogeneity test The Chi-square test was used for comparison of the demographic variables of the geriatric clients of the Experimental and control groups. Level of significance – p<0.05 was considered significant, p>0.05 was considered non-significant.

Table 2

Frequency and percentage distribution of overall pre-test and post-test level scores of the Geriatric clients in experimental and control groups. (n=30+30)

Sl. no

Severity of constipation

Score range

Experimental group f (%)

Control group f (%)

Pretest

Posttest-1

Posttest-2

Pretest

Posttest-1

Posttest-2

1.

No Problem

0-5

8 (26.6)

28(93.3)

29(96.6)

3 (10)

2 (6.6)

1(3.3)

2.

Some Problem

6-10

21(70)

2 (6.6)

1 (3.3)

22(73.3)

20(73.3)

27(90)

3.

Severe Problem

11-16

1(3.3)

0(0)

0(0)

5(16.6)

8(16.6)

2(6.6)

Total

30

30

30

30

30

30

Table 3

Distribution of m constipation score Mean, SD, of Constipation assessment scores of older adults by comparing the pretest and posttest scores between the groups Independentusing Independent t test between the groups during pretest and post-test.

Sl.no

Severity of constipation at time of test

Experimental group

Control group

MD

Independent ‘t’ Value

p-Value & Inference

Mean ± SD

1.

Pretest

7.55 ±1.94

8.44 ± 1.58

5.05

6.88

.212 NS

2.

Posttest 1

2.50 ±0.75

9.62± 2.13

1.18

1.30

<0.001**SS

3.

Posttest 2

2.24±0.69

10.01± 2.24

7.77

1.21

<0.001** SS

Table 4

Association between pretest scores among geriatric clients and theselected socio-demographic variables. (n=30+30)

Sl.no

Demographic Variables

Experimental

Control Group

Below Median (<8)

Above Median (>8)

χ2 &p value

Poor<18

M.P(>26)

χ2 &p value

1.

Age

χ2=0.475(.490) NS p > .05

χ2=0.002 (.960.)  NS p > .05.

a. b.

60-70 years 71-80 years

7 7

10 6

8 6

9 7

2.

Gender

χ2=0.135(.7125) NS  p > .05

χ2= 0.002 (.960.)  NS p > .05.

a.

Male

7

8

9

6

b.

Female

6

9

8

6

3

Educational status

χ2=0.475 (.490)  NS  p >.05.

χ2= 0.002 (.960.) NS  p > .05.

a.

Formal education

6

10

9

8

b.

No formal education

7

7

7

6

04

Religion

χ2=0.002(.960)  SS p > .05.

χ2= 0.143 (.704.)  NS p > .05.

a.

Hindu

9

10

10

9

Other religion

5

6

5

6

05

Marital status

χ2=0.143 (.704)  NS  p > .05.

χ2=1.221 (.269.) NS  p > .05.

a.

Married

10

5

7

8

b.

Widower/ widow

9

6

10

5

06

Place of Residence

χ2=1.832(.175.) NS  p > .05.

χ2= 0.535 (.464.)  NS  p > .05.

a.

Rural

12

6

8

6

b.

Semi-urban

6

6

7

9

07

Socioeconomic status

χ2=0.010.(.919.) NS  p > .05.

χ2= 0.133. (.715.)  NS p > .05.

a.

APL   

9

5

8

7

b.

BPL

10

6

7

8

08

Type of family

χ2=0.153.(.695. ) NS  p > .05.

χ2= 3.096. (.078.)  NS  p > .05.

a.

Nuclear Family

8

6

12

5

b.

Joint Family

8

8

5

8

09

Nutritional status

χ2=0.833.(.361.)  NS p > .05.

χ2=0.271.(.602.)  NS p > .05

a.

Underweight/obese

6

6

12

5

b.

Normal weight

6

12

8

5

10

Sleep Pattern

χ2=0.535. (.464.) NS p > .05.

χ2=0.002.(.960.)  NS p > .05.

a.

Normal/Adequate

9

7

9

7

b.

Disturbed/Inadequate

6

8

8

6

11.

Bowel

a.

Regular

5

10

χ2=0.143.(.704.) NS  p > .05.

10

6

χ2= 2.142. (.143.) NS  p > .05.

b.

Irregular

6

9

5

9

12.

Bladder

a.

Normal

9

8

χ2=0.135.(.712.) NS  p > .05

9

8

χ2=0.002.(.960.)  NS  p > .05.

b.

Urinary Incontinence

6

7

7

6

13.

Physical activities performed per day

a.

Not involved

6

10

χ2=1.157.(.281. ) NS  p > .05.

12

6

χ2=2.424.(.119.)  NS p > .05.

b.

Low

8

6

5

8

14.

If you fall sick, do you prefer to go

a.

Hospital Treatment

9

6

χ2=0.135.(.712. )NS  p > .05.

11

6

χ2=1.032.(.309.)  NS p > .05.

b.

With medicines

8

7

6

7

15.

Source of information

a.

Mass Media

9

7

χ2=0.001.(.960.) SS  p > .05.

9

7

χ2= 0.002(.960).  NS  p > .05.

Figure 1

Depicts the line diagram representing the mean scores of constipation assessment during pretest and posttest.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/386ed66e-4e31-4f21-ae30-ff8f4d8410e5image1.png

Results

Table 3 depicts the frequency and percentage distribution of constipation assessment among older adults during pretest and posttest, with significant improvements after the intervention.

Table 4 depicts the mean scores of constipation assessmentamong older adults during pretest and posttest, with significant improvements after the intervention.

Discussion

It was feasible and safe to deliver a Aloe vera juice Intervention among geriatric clients in health care and community settings.16 The intervention was acceptable to Geriatric clients, Caretakers and it can be developed as a protocol to improve health promotion outcome measures among the elderly.17 A key to success was the availability &medicinal effects of Aaloe vera juice to improve their Quality of Life and confidence to engage with the home remedial measures.18 This study adds to a growing body of evidence that suggests volunteers can successfully provide a intervention and take on more direct roles in supporting older individuals.19

A systematic review of 21 studies found evidence suggesting that Aloe vera is essential to improve the bowel pattern and improve health outcomes of community-dwelling older adults including severe constipation, Nutritional status20 On the initial day of recruitment, the participants were given Pretest, followed by an Aloe vera juice Intervention focusing on Constipation assessment. Posttest 1& and posttest 2 on the 10th , 20th day, which showed a greater significant improvement in relief of constipation scores among geriatric clients.21 Similarly, a range of studies emphasized physical and nutritional aspects in this study holistic comprehensive health promotion measures required for the elderly have been focused.22

LeiA systematic review of Aaloe vera and its effectiveness was conducted to synthesize existing research on the relationship between older adults’ health and functioning.23 A systematic search was conducted of electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Biosis, and the Cochrane Library). The study highlighted there are promising results, clinical effectiveness of oral a Aloe vera to relieve constipation among geriatric.24

Conclusion

Based on the study findings, Aloe vera is proven to be effective to relieve constipation among older adults. This study demonstrated that it was feasible and safe to deliver a Aloe vera juice for community-dwelling older adults both in hospital and community settings.25 The geriatric population was found to be the biggest beneficiary of Aloe vera juice intervention strategies as home remedial measures with medicinal effects.26

Limitations and scope

The study was conducted among older adults between 60-75 years age group. It can be conducted in community settings. Geriatric population was the biggest beneficiaries. Further research is needed to better understand factors that influence participants’ adherence to intervention strategies to promote the healthy aging.27

Nursing implications

  1. Nursing practice: Nursing professionals working in the hospital as well as in the community setup should know how to assess the risk of constipation.

  2. Nursing education: abundant opportunities to educate the elderly about healthy life styles and risk factors of constipation.

  3. Nursing administration: manage the patient care and delivery of specific nursing services within the health care agency.28

  4. Nursing research: Nursing research is urgently needed to improve the health with home remedial measures which are proven to be effective.29 [(30])

Recommendations of the Study

A similar study can be replicated on a large sample in different types of setting.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge the tremendous contribution of the all the geriatric clients for the cooperation in conducting the research. We thank all the authorities for the permitting to conduct research . remaining authors who have constantly supported the project from the initial phase of the study till the end in data collection process to Ms. Abiya Shibu, Ms. Namitha Elza Jojo, Ms. Adithya Murali, Ms. Suma.A,Ms. Akhila.A, Ms. Tessa Saji, Ms. Jinu Jojo, Ms. Aleena Biju, Ms. Treesa Benny, Ms. Algeena Jacob, Ms. Usha L.S, Mr. Abhilash.R, III year BSc(N) students, SDUCON.

References

1 

N Sartorius The meanings of health and its promotionCroat Med J20064746624

2 

P Jayanthi JE Ranganathan Ageing and its implicationsJ Oral Maxillofac Pathol20101424851

4 

F Meika H Duncan S Samir Evaluation of the Nutritional and Metabolic Effects of Aloe vera. Herbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects

5 

M Elizabeth onstipation: Evaluation and ManagementMo Med2018115323641

6 

WH Seung C Jaeyoung P Sunmin JL Hyun PI Jong Aloe vera is effective and safe in short-term treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysisJ Neurogastroenterol Motil201824452835

7 

A Glia G Lindberg Quality of life in patients with different types of functional constipationScand J Gastroenterol1997321110839

8 

NA Koloski M Jones R Wai Impact of persistent constipation on health-related quality of life and mortality in older community-dwelling womenAm J Gastroenterol2013108711528

9 

DA Drossman RS Sandler DC Mckee AJ Lovitz Use of a questionnaire to identify a population with bowel dysfunctionGastroenterology198283352934

10 

NJ Talley EA Keefe AR Zinsmeister LJ Melton Prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the elderly: a population-based studyGastroenterology19921023895901

11 

NJ Talley KC Fleming JM Evans Constipation in an elderly community: a study of prevalence and potential risk factorsAm J Gastroenterol19969111925

12 

A Wald C Scarpignato S Mueller-Lissner A multinational survey of prevalence and patterns of laxative use among adults with self-defined constipationAliment Pharmacol Ther200828791730

13 

RS Sandler MC Jordan BJ Shelton Demographic and dietary determinants of constipation in the US populationAm J Public Health19908021859

14 

JE Everhart VL Go RS Johannes A longitudinal survey of self-reported bowel habits in the United StatesDig Dis Sci1989348115362

15 

WE Whitehead D Drinkwater LJ Cheskin Constipation in the elderly living at home. Definition, prevalence, and relationship to lifestyle and health statusJ Am Geriatr Soc19893754239

16 

IP Donald RG Smith JG Cruikshank A study of constipation in the elderly living at homeGerontology19853121128

17 

D Harari JH Gurwitz J Avorn Bowel habit in relation to age and gender. Findings from the National Health Interview Survey and clinical implicationsArch Intern Med1996156331520

18 

RS Choung L Gr CD Schleck Cumulative incidence of chronic constipation: a population-based study 1988-2003Aliment Pharmacol Ther20072611-1215218

19 

CM Ruby GG Fillenbaum MN Kuchibhatla JT Hanlon Laxative use in the community-dwelling elderlyAm J Geriatr Pharm200311117

20 

L Shi Y Wu Epidemiology of constipation in elderly people in part of China: A Multicenter StudyJ Res Rev202210823987

21 

C Jaeyoung Aloevera in effective and safe in short term treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: A Systematic studyJ Neurogastro Motil20187613751

22 

S Shebi S Preetha Effects Of Aloe Vera On ConstipationJ Res Rev Int J Curr Adv Res2017614

23 

K Red Herbal formula improves upper and lower gastrointestinal symptoms and gut health an Australian adults with digestive disorderJ Res Rev2020763751

24 

HS Odes Z Madar A double-blind trial of a celandin, aloevera and psyllium laxative preparation in adult patients with constipation. Digestion19914926571

25 

S Prathiba Effect of aloe vera syrup on constipation among cancer patients receiving morphine. Tirumala Coll Nurs2023712337

26 

FJ Fong I Smit M Setshedi ME Engel Consumption of aloe vera to improve health outcomes in adults with irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysisJ South Afr Gastroenterol Rev200220115

27 

AO Ashafa TO Sunmonu AA Abass AA Ogbe Laxative potential of the ethanolic leaf extract of Aloe vera (L.) Burm. f. in Wistar rats with loperamide-induced constipationJ Nat Pharma20112315862

28 

HS Odes Z Madar A double- blind trial of a celandine ,Aloe Vera and psyllium laxative preparation in adult patients with constipationJ Res Rev Front Gastrointestinal Res200949212

29 

M Foster D Hunter S Samman Evaluation of the nutritional and metabolic effects of Aloe veraHerbal Medicine: Biomolecular and Clinical Aspects2nd CRC Press;2011500



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 15-10-2024

Accepted : 29-11-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.agems.2024.011


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 59

PDF Downloaded: 12